According to PYMNTS.com, Experian is launching a new credit scoring model in the UK this month that will include rental payments, overdraft usage, and phone contract payments for the first time. The system, which features an expanded score range of 0-1250 instead of the previous 0-999 scale, will roll out throughout November 2025 and reach all UK consumers by year-end. According to the company’s announcement, the new scoring approach won’t affect credit eligibility but provides “a more detailed view of people’s financial track record.” Managing Director Edu Castro stated the system better reflects “everyday financial behaviors that matter,” though this data expansion raises significant questions about consumer protection and financial privacy.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Unseen Dangers of Expanded Financial Surveillance
While Experian presents this as purely beneficial for consumers, the inclusion of rental payments creates a dangerous precedent for financial surveillance. Landlords now become de facto credit reporters, and any disputes over maintenance issues or deposit disagreements could inadvertently damage tenants’ creditworthiness. Unlike credit card payments where consumers have direct control over timing and amounts, rental payments often depend on landlord responsiveness to maintenance requests and other external factors. This creates a power imbalance where tenants might hesitate to assert their rights for fear of credit score retaliation.
The Technical and Accuracy Hurdles Ahead
The practical implementation of tracking rental payments presents enormous challenges that Experian’s AI-powered risk management tools may struggle to overcome. Rental data comes from thousands of different landlords and property management systems with varying levels of digital sophistication and reporting consistency. Missing payments could result from administrative errors, banking delays, or disputed charges rather than financial distress. The expanded 0-1250 scale, while offering more granularity, also creates more opportunities for scoring inconsistencies and makes it harder for consumers to understand what constitutes a “good” score.
Privacy in the Age of Behavioral Scoring
Tracking overdraft usage patterns and phone contract payments moves credit scoring into the realm of behavioral monitoring rather than simple payment history. This creates a detailed profile of how people manage their daily finances that could be used for purposes beyond credit decisions. While Executives like Castro emphasize personalization, this level of financial behavior tracking raises serious questions about data usage boundaries. Could patterns of overdraft usage during certain times of month be used to infer employment instability or other sensitive information that goes beyond traditional credit assessment?
Broader Implications for Financial Inclusion
The timing of this expansion coincides with growing pressure on lenders to serve subprime and thin-file consumers, but the approach may have unintended consequences. While intended to help renters build credit history, it could disproportionately penalize those in unstable housing situations or areas with problematic landlords. The system might also create a two-tier credit assessment where traditional borrowers continue with conventional metrics while renters and those using alternative financial services face additional scrutiny. This could potentially widen rather than narrow the financial inclusion gap if not implemented with careful safeguards.
The Coming Regulatory Scrutiny
As Experian rolls out this expanded scoring system, regulatory attention is inevitable. The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority and Information Commissioner’s Office will likely examine whether the collection of this additional behavioral data complies with data protection laws and consumer financial protection regulations. The system’s transparency, accuracy challenges, and potential for discriminatory outcomes will face particular scrutiny. Companies implementing similar systems in other markets should watch the UK rollout closely as it will likely set precedents for how regulators approach behavioral financial data collection globally.
