According to Forbes, MP Materials has experienced a nearly 10% stock decline over the last five trading days and is down approximately 30% from its October 14 peak, when China imposed additional restrictions on rare-earth exports. This volatility coincides with optimism about a potential U.S.-China trade agreement ahead of President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s scheduled meeting in South Korea. The company reported second-quarter 2025 revenue soaring 84% to $57.4 million with NdPr oxide output increasing 119% year-over-year, while the U.S. Department of Defense invested $400 million in equity and Apple secured a $500 million supply agreement. Despite these strong fundamentals, MP trades at approximately 40 times forward revenue and reported a $53.5 million net loss year-to-date, creating a complex investment landscape.
Table of Contents
The Geopolitical Chess Game Beyond Trade Talks
The current market reaction to potential trade negotiations fundamentally misunderstands the structural shift occurring in rare earth supply chains. Even if a comprehensive trade deal emerges, the United States has crossed a strategic Rubicon regarding Chinese rare earth dependence. The Defense Department’s $400 million investment in MP Materials represents more than just financial backing—it’s a declaration that certain supply chains are now considered critical national security infrastructure. This perspective change is permanent and transcends whichever administration occupies the White House. The reported price floor arrangement for MP Materials suggests policymakers recognize that rebuilding domestic capacity requires protection from China’s ability to temporarily flood markets and bankrupt competitors.
Execution Risks in the Magnet Manufacturing Transition
While MP’s mining operations at Mountain Pass demonstrate impressive production growth, the company’s ambitious plan to manufacture finished magnets represents a fundamentally different business with distinct operational challenges. Moving from raw material production to sophisticated manufacturing requires entirely new expertise in precision engineering, quality control, and advanced materials science. The timeline to reach 10,000 metric tons of annual magnet production by 2028 is aggressive, and history shows that scaling complex manufacturing processes often encounters unexpected delays and cost overruns. Competitors in Japan and Europe have spent decades refining magnet production technologies, while MP must essentially build this capability from scratch despite having the raw materials advantage.
The Valuation Disconnect Between Mining and Technology
MP’s current valuation multiples more closely resemble a high-growth technology company than a materials producer, creating significant investor risk. The 40x forward revenue multiple assumes flawless execution of both mining expansion and manufacturing build-out while simultaneously achieving profitability. Mining businesses traditionally trade at much lower multiples due to commodity price cyclicality and capital intensity. While MP benefits from strategic importance and policy support, the fundamental economics of mining and manufacturing remain challenging. The company’s $126 million cash burn year-to-date highlights the capital-intensive nature of this transition phase, and profitability may remain elusive even as revenues grow if margin compression occurs from increased competition or technological shifts.
The Emerging Western Rare Earth Ecosystem
MP Materials shouldn’t be viewed in isolation but as the flagship of a broader Western effort to rebuild rare earth capabilities. The $1.8 billion consortium announced by Orion Resource Partners and JPMorgan Chase’s planned $10 billion investment in strategic industries indicate that institutional capital recognizes this sector’s long-term importance. However, this emerging ecosystem faces coordination challenges—multiple companies may duplicate efforts or compete for the same limited pool of specialized talent and equipment. The success of China’s rare earth dominance came from vertically integrated state-backed champions, while Western approaches remain more fragmented across public and private entities with potentially conflicting objectives.
Strategic Positioning Versus Market Timing
For long-term investors, the current volatility may represent a strategic entry point despite near-term uncertainty. The fundamental demand drivers for rare earth elements—electric vehicle adoption, renewable energy expansion, and defense modernization—remain robust and largely disconnected from trade negotiation outcomes. MP’s unique position as the only active rare earth mine in the United States provides structural advantages that extend beyond typical mining economics. However, investors should recognize this as a multi-year thematic investment rather than a tactical trade, with the potential for continued volatility as the company navigates its manufacturing transition and the broader industry restructuring.
