According to CNBC, Meta’s shocking June announcement to invest $14.3 billion primarily to hire Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang and key employees immediately threw the startup’s future into doubt. OpenAI soon disclosed it was winding down work with Scale, while Google and Elon Musk’s xAI reportedly paused their relationships following the deal. But nearly five months later, Scale CFO Dennis Cinelli insists the 1,000-person company is thriving, calling characterizations of the Meta deal as an “acquihire” untrue. He claims Scale has signed some of its best deals in company history over the past two to three months, including a $99 million U.S. Department of Defense contract in August followed by another $100 million deal in September.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
<h2 id="the-data-labeling-business“>The Data Labeling Reality
Here’s the thing about Scale’s core business – they’re basically the behind-the-scenes workforce that makes AI models smarter. While everyone obsesses over the flashy model builders like OpenAI and Google, companies like Scale do the unglamorous work of data labeling and preparation that actually trains these systems. They compete with Appen and Surge AI in what’s become a brutally competitive commodity business. And when your biggest clients start worrying you might become an extension of their direct competitor? Well, that’s when relationships get complicated fast.
The Government Lifeline
Those Defense Department contracts aren’t just nice-to-have revenue streams – they’re potentially game-changing. We’re talking about $99 million in August followed by another $100 million in September. Government work comes with longer sales cycles but way more stability than the volatile commercial AI market. The timing couldn’t be better for Scale, since losing OpenAI as a customer had to hurt. I mean, how many data labeling companies can say they’ve secured nearly $200 million in government contracts in two months?
The Survival Strategy
So what’s Scale’s play here? They’re basically executing the classic “pivot to enterprise and government” move that many startups attempt when their initial market gets rocky. The applications business Cinelli mentioned – creating custom AI solutions for large organizations – represents a higher-margin opportunity than pure data labeling. But here’s the million-dollar question: can they really replace the revenue and credibility they lost from the OpenAI and Google departures? Government contracts are great, but they don’t necessarily translate to staying competitive in the fast-moving commercial AI space.
Broader Implications
This whole situation reveals something important about the AI infrastructure ecosystem. When big tech companies make these massive talent-focused investments, the collateral damage can be significant. Scale’s experience shows how delicate the balance is between partnering with tech giants and maintaining independence. Other AI infrastructure companies are probably watching this closely and thinking, “Could this happen to us?” The CFO’s aggressive pushback suggests Scale knows the perception problem is real – and potentially damaging to their remaining commercial relationships.
