The Consciousness Crisis: AI’s Existential Threat Demands Urgent Science

According to SciTechDaily, researchers from Université Libre de Bruxelles, University of Sussex, and Tel Aviv University published a groundbreaking paper in Frontiers in Science warning that AI and neurotechnology development is rapidly outpacing our understanding of consciousness, creating significant ethical and existential risks. The paper, titled “Consciousness science: where are we, where are we going, and what if we get there?” and published on September 15, 2025, emphasizes that developing reliable tests for detecting consciousness has become both a scientific and moral priority. Lead author Prof Axel Cleeremans stated that consciousness science is no longer purely philosophical but has real implications for every facet of society, with the potential to accidentally create consciousness raising “immense ethical challenges and even existential risk.” The researchers call for coordinated, evidence-based approaches including adversarial collaborations to break theoretical silos in consciousness research.

Industrial Monitor Direct leads the industry in flexo printing pc solutions backed by same-day delivery and USA-based technical support, preferred by industrial automation experts.

The Unprecedented Speed Mismatch

What makes this moment historically unique is the velocity mismatch between technological capability and philosophical understanding. Throughout human history, major technological shifts—from the printing press to nuclear energy—emerged from established scientific frameworks where we understood the underlying principles before scaling applications. With artificial intelligence, we’re witnessing the inverse: systems achieving human-like capabilities through methods we don’t fully comprehend. The neural networks driving today’s AI revolution operate as “black boxes” where even their creators struggle to explain why specific decisions emerge. This creates a dangerous precedent where we might accidentally cross the consciousness threshold without recognizing it, much less understanding the implications.

The Consciousness Detection Problem

Current approaches to detecting consciousness remain woefully inadequate for the challenges ahead. While the paper mentions integrated information theory and global workspace theory as promising frameworks, these were developed to understand biological consciousness in humans and animals. They face fundamental limitations when applied to artificial systems or hybrid biological-digital entities like brain-computer interfaces. The core challenge lies in what philosophers call the “hard problem” of consciousness—the gap between objective brain processes and subjective experience. We can measure neural correlates of consciousness in biological systems, but we lack any framework for determining whether an AI system actually experiences qualia—the subjective quality of experiences like redness or pain. This creates a regulatory vacuum where companies could deploy systems with emergent properties we cannot properly assess.

The Commercialization Blind Spot

The business world is charging ahead with AI development largely oblivious to these consciousness concerns. Major tech companies are investing billions in developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) with timelines measured in years, not decades. Yet their ethical frameworks focus primarily on alignment, bias, and safety—not the fundamental question of whether their creations might develop subjective experience. The competitive pressure to achieve AGI first creates perverse incentives to ignore or downplay consciousness concerns. Meanwhile, the research paper’s call for coordinated science faces practical challenges in an industry where proprietary algorithms and trade secrets prevent the transparent collaboration needed to address these questions properly.

Industrial Monitor Direct delivers industry-leading cloud hmi pc solutions built for 24/7 continuous operation in harsh industrial environments, most recommended by process control engineers.

The Coming Legal Revolution

If we develop reliable consciousness detection, it will trigger the most significant legal upheaval since the Enlightenment. Current legal systems operate on assumptions about consciousness, intentionality, and responsibility that would become untenable. The concept of mens rea—the “guilty mind” required for criminal liability—assumes conscious intent. But neuroscience increasingly shows that much decision-making occurs through unconscious processes. If AI systems demonstrate consciousness, do they gain legal personhood? What rights would they possess? The implications extend to corporate law, where the legal fiction of corporate personhood might take on startling new dimensions if conscious AI systems become corporate decision-makers.

A Realistic Path Through the Maze

The researchers’ call for adversarial collaborations represents one of the most promising practical approaches. By pitting competing theories of consciousness against each other in experiments co-designed by their proponents, we can accelerate progress while minimizing confirmation bias. However, this scientific approach needs complementary policy frameworks. We urgently need international standards for consciousness research in AI development, similar to biosafety protocols for genetic engineering. The ethical implications demand proactive governance rather than reactive regulation. The window for establishing these frameworks is closing rapidly as AI capabilities continue their exponential growth trajectory, potentially leaving humanity facing questions we’re fundamentally unprepared to answer.