According to The Economist, Georgia is experiencing unprecedented political attention on its Public Service Commission elections as data center expansion collides with public concerns about rising electricity bills. Data centers now consume 5% of America’s electricity, up from 2% a decade ago, with projections reaching nearly 10% by 2030. Despite average power bills increasing around 40% since 2019, analysis using Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory models found no direct association between data center growth and bill increases, with Virginia and Georgia actually seeing lower-than-projected increases. However, interconnection capacity auction prices have soared due to data center demand, potentially raising household bills by up to 5%. The situation has prompted both regulatory changes and community opposition, with half of Americans now opposing local data center construction.
Table of Contents
The Grid Economics Paradox
The relationship between data center growth and electricity pricing reveals a complex economic reality that challenges conventional wisdom. While many assume that increased demand automatically drives up costs, the reality of electricity grid economics is more nuanced. Fixed infrastructure costs—from transmission lines to substations—represent a significant portion of utility expenses. When new industrial customers like data centers join the grid, they help spread these fixed costs across more kilowatt-hours, potentially lowering per-unit expenses for all customers. This explains why states with the most data center growth haven’t necessarily seen the highest bill increases.
The Political Dynamics of Power
The situation in Georgia illustrates how infrastructure decisions are becoming increasingly politicized. The Georgia Public Service Commission elections gaining unusual attention reflects a broader trend where energy policy intersects with local governance. What makes this particularly challenging is that data center opposition often stems from visible local impacts—construction noise, land use changes, and concerns about electromagnetic interference—while the actual electricity cost drivers are often regional infrastructure projects like Plant Vogtle’s nuclear expansion. This disconnect between perception and reality creates fertile ground for political maneuvering.
The Demand Response Opportunity
Data centers represent both a challenge and potential solution for grid management. Their unique ability to rapidly scale computing loads makes them ideal candidates for demand response programs. Unlike manufacturing facilities that require continuous operation, many data center workloads can be shifted geographically or temporally without service interruption. Advanced cooling systems and on-site battery storage could allow data centers to reduce consumption during peak demand periods, effectively acting as virtual power plants. The Department of Energy’s proposed rule for faster grid connections for curtailable data centers recognizes this potential, but widespread implementation requires significant technological and regulatory innovation.
The Infrastructure Investment Dilemma
The nightmare scenario haunting utility regulators involves stranded assets—building expensive new generation capacity only to see data center demand evaporate. This risk is particularly acute given the rapid pace of technological change in computing efficiency and the mobility of digital infrastructure. Unlike traditional industrial users that typically remain in locations for decades, data centers can theoretically relocate computing loads to more favorable jurisdictions relatively quickly. This creates a fundamental tension: utilities need long-term commitments to justify billion-dollar infrastructure investments, while data center operators want flexibility to adapt to changing economic and technological conditions.
The Broader Implications
What’s happening in Georgia and Virginia represents the leading edge of a national conversation about how we manage the digital economy’s physical infrastructure requirements. The data center backlash isn’t just about electricity bills—it’s about community control, land use priorities, and who bears the costs and benefits of technological progress. As artificial intelligence workloads dramatically increase computing demands, these tensions will only intensify. The resolution will require new models for public-private partnership, more sophisticated rate structures, and greater transparency about both the costs and benefits that data centers bring to communities.
