According to Engineering News, an opinion piece by Dr. Sean Phillips, the Department of Water and Sanitation director-general, tackles the universal problem of infrastructure projects blowing their schedules and budgets. He cites a Google AI search finding that a staggering 90% of large global construction projects experience cost overruns or delays, with average overruns of 28-79% and delays often exceeding 50%. Phillips argues the causes are deeply rooted in the complex, risky nature of construction itself, not just poor planning. He points to uncontrollable factors like weather, labor strikes, and even violent “construction mafia” intimidation in South Africa. The article stresses that societal pressure for fast, cheap results often backfires, and that a project finishing only 25% over budget is actually performing well by international standards.
The Unforgiving Nature of Building Stuff
Here’s the thing we often forget: construction is insanely complex. It’s not like software where you can roll back a buggy update overnight. You’re coordinating armies of specialized contractors, dealing with the earth (which never reads the plans), and hoping the weather plays nice. A single delay—a late shipment, a week of rain, a surprise granite slab where your pipe should go—sends ripples through the entire schedule. Phillips is right. Even with perfect management, you’re making educated guesses on time and cost. It’s all estimates. And the real world loves to prove estimates wrong.
When Pressure Makes Problems Worse
Now, this is where it gets really frustrating. Society, from politicians to the media to communities, demands these projects yesterday and for pennies on the dollar. So, what happens? Project managers get pressured into wildly optimistic timelines and budgets from the start. Or, a project gets a late green light and they’re told to “accelerate” to make up time. But cutting corners to go faster usually means doing things twice, which makes you slower and poorer. It’s a self-defeating cycle. And then when the inevitable delay happens, the headlines scream and everyone acts shocked. Look, if a four-year project finishes a year late, that’s basically on time in the construction world. We just set ourselves up for disappointment with unrealistic expectations.
A Uniquely Dangerous Context
The article gets truly stark when describing the environment in South Africa. The “construction mafia” phenomenon—where armed groups extort projects—adds a layer of risk you won’t find in most project management textbooks. Phillips mentions project managers being forcibly detained and others requesting guns for site visits. How can you focus on critical path analysis when you’re worried about physical safety? This extreme example highlights a broader truth: managing these projects is a high-stress job even under the best conditions. Add in intimidation, sensational media, and political pressure, and it’s a miracle anyone stays in the role. No wonder there’s a talent retention problem.
Shifting the Mindset
So what’s the answer? Phillips is clear: none of this excuses genuine incompetence or corruption. Those need to be rooted out. But his core argument is about a needed shift in public understanding. We have to stop viewing a project that’s moderately over budget or behind schedule as an automatic failure or a scandal. It’s often just the reality of building complex things in an unpredictable world. We need more realistic buffers and less outrage. For the professionals overseeing these massive undertakings, from the project managers to the engineers specifying the industrial control systems and industrial panel PCs that run modern facilities, the work is hard enough. Recognizing the inherent challenges, rather than vilifying the outcomes, might be the first step toward actually improving them.
