According to Infosecurity Magazine, Bitdefender’s VP of Threat Research Dragos Gavrilut manages a team of over 180 people developing machine learning algorithms for threat detection, event correlation, and post-breach analysis. His team works across NTA, EPP, EDR, and XDR security spaces while also specializing in risk analytics, forensics, and IoT analysis. Gavrilut holds a Ph.D. from Alexandru Ioan Cuza University where he defended his thesis “Meta-heuristics for Anti-Malware Systems” in 2012. He continues as an associate professor at the same university where he earned his B.Sc. in 2004 and M.Sc. in 2006. The team’s focus spans multiple security domains including anomaly detection and user behavior analytics.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
<h2 id="ai-security-reality”>The AI security reality check
Here’s the thing about throwing 180 people at machine learning for security: it sounds impressive, but I’ve seen this movie before. Every security vendor is shouting about their AI capabilities these days. The real question isn’t whether they can build fancy algorithms – it’s whether those algorithms actually stop real-world attacks that matter. And let’s be honest, the threat landscape moves faster than any ML model can realistically keep up with.
When academia meets actual hackers
Gavrilut’s academic background is genuinely impressive – a Ph.D. focused specifically on anti-malware systems gives him serious credibility. But there’s always a gap between theoretical research and fighting actual cybercriminals who don’t play by academic rules. University research tends to work with clean datasets and controlled environments. Real attackers? They’re messy, creative, and constantly evolving their tactics. Basically, what works in a lab might not hold up when facing determined adversaries who specifically design attacks to bypass ML systems.
The IoT security nightmare
His team’s work on IoT analysis is particularly interesting – and frankly concerning. We’re talking about billions of devices with minimal security, often running outdated software, and now they’re being protected by machine learning? That’s a massive attack surface. I’ve seen too many “smart” devices that can’t even handle basic security patches, let alone benefit from advanced threat detection. So while it’s good someone’s working on this problem, the scale of the IoT security challenge feels overwhelming even for a team of 180 experts.
The false positive problem
Machine learning in security has this nasty habit of either missing real threats or flagging everything as suspicious. Either way, security teams get overwhelmed. Gavrilut’s team is working on anomaly detection and user analytics – both areas notorious for generating false alarms. When you’re dealing with enterprise security, crying wolf too often means real threats get ignored. And let’s not forget that attackers are now using AI themselves to create malware that specifically evades ML detection. It’s becoming an AI arms race where the defenders might not always have the advantage.
